Monday, March 31, 2008
Wiz Response
I also have a few pieces of constructive criticism for you. A lot of the specifics about the parts of the brain and how it works weren't really relevant, yet you kept telling us to "remember them for the activity after." This was contradictory to everything you were teaching us, because you weren't helping us to learn the material and remember it. Overall, one thing that I think would have been helpful was to have a mini-activity between each section, so that you could make use of the down-time that you taught us our minds' have. This would also have helped to make for easier transition throughout the presentation, and maybe if one activity had been kinesthetic, it would have reduced antsy-ness.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
response to "Becoming a 'Wiz' at Brain-Based Teaching" presentation
The need for a safe and supportive environment was reiterated a few times throughout the presentation; this was effective. Adolescents are susceptible mood changes and their egos are fragile; a supportive environment is necessary in the classroom to maximize learning. You delved deep into memory --what it is, what it means, and most importantly, how to make productive use of it with out students. Again, your resources will help later when the facts you gave and points you made may be forgotten. I thought it would have been useful for you to address specific ways to make concepts and content more significant; you spoke of the importance of sense and significance, but didn't shed any light on how to go about actually making the content significant.
I really liked that a couple of pages have a "review" at the end of the page that listed the big ideas and overarching concepts of the chapter; it fit in well with the steps the author gives for moving information from sensory memory to long-term memory. The last page reviewed the prominent themes in the book, which was a helpful in tying everything together. Great presentation.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Student Oriented Curriculum
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Book Talk: Student Oriented Curriculum
Your presentation was alright, but I felt like there could have been better use of the MIs and maybe more hands-on activities for us. You would have to have shortened your other activities, but it would have kept us more engaged. It also seemed like some of the members of the group put a lot more effort into the presentation, but that the work they did was really good. Lastly, I feel like your wiki was very jumbled, and that you should have all stuck with the wiki format rather than just linking your individual pieces to it.
I really liked the idea of team building, and having us do an activity was a great idea. It can be very important for a class to come together (as we saw with the Freedom Writers). I also like how students guided the curriculum and how you guys walked us through the process of designing curriculum. Having teachers and students sharing all of the roles in a classroom is a great way to turn everyone into teachers and help provide a sense of ownership to the work you do.
SOC blog-Abbie
The team-building activity was a great example, and it really gave me the feel of what is needed to get the students to work together so that the responsibility can effectively move from the teachers to the students. The unit-deciding activity also gave some insight as to how much the students are involved, how much they are in charge of their education.
You had some great resources: Steph's chart is certainly helpful; again, it lays out what is necessary, and how the process works. The clip we watched on "This We Believe -In Action" was great because we can see that these ideas and concepts are really being implemented in the classroom -Dr. Grace should consider showing us more of it because of what our goal is in this course. I'm going to go out and get a copy of Student Oriented Curriculum; it will be a great tool, even if the school I end up at or the team I end up working on doesn't go all out as Lee did, it appears to have some good ideas and resources for integrating students' opinions and needs into a regular curriculum.
It's interesting that this appeared to be specifically useful to students who were on the "cusp of staying and taking directions, or moving on and thinking on their own." It's great that your group pointed this out because that is the point that many middle schoolers are at, and it's important for us as future educators to take note of it.
Overall, great job; it was quite interesting and informative.
Monday, March 17, 2008
Katie's SOC Blog
I really liked the way that the team building part was introduced, but I felt like there should have been a little more explanation about Student Oriented Curriculum first. The diagram on wiki explained the important parts of team building well and the activity was a good way to introduce it to our students. I know the activity wasn’t meant to be done twice but being able to change activities when they don’t work out the first time is a part of teaching.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Turning Points 2000 - Chapter 3
When you start with standards, teachers know exactly what students need to learn from their class. Focusing on the big ideas and essential questions is the best way for teachers to accomplish this. They also have to create units that connect with students' lives and maintain their interest. Just because a teacher covers a lot of material during a school year, it doesn't mean that the students will learn any more material. Students will do a lot better if they spend more time working and mastering the big ideas, instead of speeding through smaller concepts.
Assessment is another big part of backwards design. Turning Points 2000 supports varied and authentic assessments along with some formal test and quizzes and informal, such as walking behind students and check their work. Projects are another great assessment strategy. Students need different ways to show that they know the material. They also need to know exactly what is expected of them. Rubrics are a great way for students to know what they are going to be graded on before they even start their project.
Chapter 3 also discusses the "twin towers" of education - excellence and equity. Excellence and equity should be present in both the curriculum and assessment. Excellence requires high standards that makes students acquire and utilize specific skills. Equity means that the standards set expectations that every students can meet.